Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Spells
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,450×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Voodoo Magic
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.40% against 96.50% — Voodoo Magic is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 1,450× against 1,000×, with Wild Spells higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Voodoo Magic returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Spells reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
