Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Wild Spells

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.40%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
1,450×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fantasy
Free demo available →
VS

Voodoo Magic

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.50%
Volatility
High
Win cap
1,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fantasy
Free demo available →
VS

Magic Piggy OG

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
2,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fantasy, Animals

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Wild Spells vs Voodoo Magic

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • Published RTP: 96.40% against 96.50% — Voodoo Magic is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 1,450× against 1,000×, with Wild Spells higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Voodoo Magic returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Spells reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Fantasy.

Wild Spells vs Magic Piggy OG

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.40% against 96.20% — Wild Spells is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 1,450× against 2,500×, with Magic Piggy OG higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Spells returns more in theory over the long run, while Magic Piggy OG reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Fantasy.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)