Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild West Gold Blazing Bounty
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth, Wild west
VS
Candy Rush Wilds 2
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.48% against 96.21% — Wild West Gold Blazing Bounty is 0.27 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 7,500× against 5,000×, with Wild West Gold Blazing Bounty higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
