Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Booongo

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 95.10% against 95.91% — Pixies vs Pirates is 0.81 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 12,000× and 11,907×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Pixies vs Pirates does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Pixies vs Pirates returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Wild Bananas reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)