Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.31% — Coywolf Cash is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.6×: 2,500× against 4,000×, with Coywolf Cash higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Low against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Animals, Wealth.

Different format families: Wolf Gold is Fixed paylines, Piggy Gold is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.00% against 95.86% — Wolf Gold is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 2,500× against 5,000×, with Piggy Gold higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Piggy Gold does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wolf Gold returns more in theory over the long run, while Piggy Gold reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Animals, Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)