Slot reviews

[Slot review] 9 Masks of Fire HyperSpins — Microgaming

The same studio reissuing the same game roughly two years later. Volatility stays Medium, RTP is up 0.25 points, and the maximum bet drops from 240 to 60. A look at what a re-release changes in the published spec.

Reelwise editorial2026-09-299 Masks of Fire™ HyperSpins™
  • Microgaming
  • HyperSpins
  • Re-release
  • 96.49% RTP
PROVIDERMicrogaming
FORMATVideo slot
RTP96.49%
VOLATILITYMedium
MIN BET0.2
MAX BET60

Overview

9 Masks of Fire HyperSpins is a slot Microgaming released on 2 December 2021. The published RTP is 96.49%, volatility is Medium, and the bet range is 0.2 to 60. The hub's theme tags are the same as the original's: Action, Africa, Fire.

The original 9 Masks Of Fire came out on 6 February 2020. The gap is just under two years, and the studio and theme tags are the same. The word 'HyperSpins' added to the name sums up what makes this version different.

Layout and rules

HyperSpins is a feature name used across Microgaming's range, generally referring to an optional mechanic that lets you pay extra to respin a single reel of your choice after a base spin stops, with a separate respin price shown for each reel. This game's hub feature field is empty, however, and how the respin price is set is not in the published specification, so this review describes only the general frame and does not guess at this title's specifics.

As with the original, the format field says only 'Video slot', so the reel, row and line layout is unpublished. The paytable and feature conditions are unpublished too. Whether the two versions share the same base grid cannot be confirmed from the published spec either.

Free demo

See the screen you're reading about

The official demo published by Microgaming. It runs on play money only; no real funds are involved.

If the demo does not appear, check your browser's frame-blocking settings.

The three fields the re-release changed

Put the published spec next to the original's and the differences sit in three fields. RTP rose 0.25 points from 96.24% to 96.49%, the minimum bet is unchanged at 0.2, and the maximum bet fell from 240 to 60 — a quarter of the original. Volatility is Medium on both.

The RTP rise invites the thought that adding an optional respin mechanic changed how the overall return is calculated, but the studio has not published the breakdown, so this review does not state that as the cause. Those 0.25 points are a difference in a long-run theoretical value, not something a single session would make visible.

Max win is blank in the hub for both versions. Whether the re-release changed the cap, or how the HyperSpins mechanic affects it, cannot be answered from this catalogue's published figures.

Presentation

The cover swaps the original's black ground for an orange field. The blue-eyed mask stares straight out, and the fire behind it never reaches the surface. In a warm frame, the eyes are the only cool colour and pull the gaze. The original's single-mask composition is kept, and one background colour tells the versions apart.

The demo is embedded on this page. How the HyperSpins respin prices are shown, and whether the base grid matches the original, are best settled by opening both demos side by side and comparing their rules screens.

Strengths

  • Its published spec can be compared field by field with the original, making the re-release's changes clear
  • The published RTP is 0.25 points higher than the original's
  • Volatility and minimum bet match the original, so the fields that differ stand out on their own

Weak points

  • The maximum bet shrank to a quarter of the original's (60)
  • The HyperSpins respin pricing and the feature list are not in the published specification
  • Max win and the reel, row and line layout are unpublished

Verdict

The HyperSpins version is a good example of how a re-release shows up in a published spec: the band left alone, RTP and the bet ceiling adjusted, and the new mechanic's details left outside the spec sheet.