Slot reviews
[Slot review] Mahjong Ways 2 — PG Soft
The board's first PG Soft review. This studio publishes only RTP and the win cap — no volatility, hit rate or bet range — so the flagship title becomes a study in what a half-empty spec sheet can and cannot tell you.

Overview
Mahjong Ways 2 is a 5-reel video slot PG Soft released in April 2020, the second entry in the studio's best-known series. The published spec: 96.95% RTP, a 100,000× win cap, and a listed Free Spins feature. That is the entire disclosure — volatility, hit rate and bet range are not published.
That gap is why, twelve reviews in, this is the board's first PG Soft title. Earlier reviews studied how to read published figures — Play'n GO's four-way disclosure, Nolimit's raw index. This one studies the opposite end: where reading must stop when half the sheet is blank. No catalogue demonstrates better why this site marks unpublished items as such instead of filling them from third parties.
Layout and rules
The studio's spec discloses the layout down to five reels and a Free Spins feature — and no further. Row counts, ways, per-symbol payouts and the free-spin entry rules are absent from the public catalogue, so they are not listed here; the in-game rules screen in the demo is the only source with exact values.
One disclosure note is specific to this studio: the RTP PG Soft publishes is its maximum. That runs the opposite way from Play'n GO, which publishes the default configuration and notes that lower builds exist. The same 'RTP' field holds different things at different studios — 96.95% should be read as the highest configuration this game reaches, and a live deployment may sit below it. The Learn article on RTP configurations covers this distinction.
Free demo
See the screen you're reading about
The official demo published by PG Soft. It runs on play money only; no real funds are involved.
If the demo does not appear, check your browser's frame-blocking settings.
Reading the numbers
Of the two published values, the cap carries more to read. 100,000× sits at the top of this catalogue, and set beside the original Mahjong Ways (January 2020, 96.92% RTP, 25,000× cap) it shows the sequel quadrupling the ceiling within three months. The RTP gap is 0.03 points — effectively identical. Where the two published specs diverge, then, is not the return rate but the length of the payout tail.
Here is where an inference must stop. "Four times the cap, so much higher volatility" reads naturally — and cannot be checked while volatility is unpublished. The cap states one point, the theoretical maximum payout; how widely results swing is set by the shape of the whole paytable, and that paytable is not public. This is also why the title never appears under this site's volatility filters: an unpublished value is not a zero and not an estimate — it is simply absent.
Which leaves one honest way to learn this game's volatility: run the demo and keep a log. The Learn article on logging felt volatility is the format — length of quiet stretches, feature frequency, the range of multipliers seen, never amounts or wins and losses. The fewer figures a studio publishes, the more that log becomes the only data there is.
Presentation
The theme is mahjong tiles. Visual taste is not something a review should adjudicate, but the fit between format and theme is worth noting — tiles are inherently gridded objects, so the reel screen and the subject agree from the start, and since the symbols are tiles, counted combinations are comparatively easy to follow on screen.
Open the rules screen first when you launch the demo. With half the spec sheet unpublished, the ways count, the paytable and the free-spin rules exist only inside the game. On a well-documented title the rules screen is a cross-check; on this one it is the primary source.
Strengths
- The flagship of the best catalogue for learning to handle unpublished figures without guessing
- Same RTP as the original Mahjong Ways but four times the cap — a clean pair for separating what the two published values each measure
- The tile grid makes counted combinations easy to follow on screen
Weak points
- Volatility, hit rate, bet range and paytable are all unpublished — the in-game rules screen is the primary source
- The published 96.95% is a maximum-RTP disclosure; a live deployment may sit below it
Verdict
Facing a half-published spec sheet there are only two jobs: read the published values precisely — down to what kind of RTP figure it is — and leave the blanks blank. If the gap bothers you, run the demo and log what you felt. For this title, your session report is the only volatility data in existence.