[Quick take] Candy Burst — PG Soft
Released on the same day and at the same RTP as Mahjong Ways 2, with a very different cap. It shows how little a single RTP says about a game's character.
Slot reviews
Slot review board
Reviews written around game structure and screen design. They do not forecast results, encourage play, or point to any operator.
7 reviews
No.TitleAuthorPosted
[Quick take] Wild Bandito — PG Soft
On published specs alone it is almost indistinguishable from Mahjong Ways — a good test of how far a half-published spec sheet can go.
[Quick take] Dragon Hatch — PG Soft
Sequels do not always raise the cap. Dragon Hatch is an original with a higher published cap than its follow-up.
[Quick take] Fortune Rabbit — PG Soft
The only Fortune title whose spec sheet spells out its row layout. That the middle reel is one row taller is published structure, not guesswork.
[Quick take] Fortune Tiger — PG Soft
Line PG Soft's 3-reel Fortune titles up by release date and only the win cap climbs; the RTP barely moves. Fortune Tiger is the third step.
[Slot review] Guardians of Ice & Fire — PG Soft
The board's second PG Soft review. A diamond-shaped grid with a different row count per reel that multiplies out exactly to the published 576 ways — a rare chance to check the arithmetic — plus another look at this studio's maximum-RTP disclosure habit.
[Slot review] Mahjong Ways 2 — PG Soft
The board's first PG Soft review. This studio publishes only RTP and the win cap — no volatility, hit rate or bet range — so the flagship title becomes a study in what a half-empty spec sheet can and cannot tell you.